Context
Continuous improvement of the Controller’s activity: Automate the various processes and activities in order to reduce maintenance (in production)
Targer User Population
Controller
Succinct description of the implementation of this application and its added value
- Understanding the business activity
- Framing and definition of customer needs
- Optimize current treatments by implementing evolutions
- Writing detailed functional specifications
- Increasing the effectiveness of the Management Controller
- Improving financial analysis
- Time saving for the financial controller
- Capitalising processes
Two teams work together, Level 1 and Level 2.
Team Level 1 has the following activities: (described in detail in the following sections)
- Preparation of Application Improvement Process
- Writing detailed functional specifications
- Recipe of evolutions (monitoring, strategy, recipe…)
- Communication to users on projects or processes implemented
- Facilitation of workshops with the trade to take into account developments
- Link with the teams of the different source and target applications during activity monitoring and tests
Interactions between the two teams:
- The Level 1 team reports user requirements to the L2 team for taking into account and correcting anomalies and/or incidents.
- The Level 1 team transfers elements relating to future evolutions to the Level 2 team and provides support to bring its business
- expertise on the Essbase design for certain user requests.
- When creating upgrades or detecting anomalies in production by users, the Level 1 team ensures that they are taken into account for
- the next release.
Level 2 exchanges with the aMOA team and takes care of it:
- Development and integration of all Essbase application evolutions
- The design of the technical solution and its costing, which are validated by the aMOA.
Process and Sourcing
- Process Split L1 Vs L2
- SAP
- MICROSTRATEGY
- MS BI
